CONNECTION To Time Ripple Posted by Shirley Knott on July 25, 1998 at 06:39:27:
In Reply to: Not till we know "Life" completely will we know what "Death" is. posted by narada on June 09, 1998 at 10:43:21:
Seth had some interesting notions on the concept of Time, too.
It's impossible to separate the notions of Time and Death, in my opinion - without one, there is no other.
Seth said that 'the past' is subjective - it was subjectively interpreted 'at the time', and has since been rearranged in our memories to suit other agendas, or as attitudes and associations changed. All is now. He acknowledged the existence of so-called time ripples, whereby the present can affect the past, and the future can affect the present, but said that the whole thing was immaterial anyway, as time "has no meaning without barriers". He wnt on to say that his explaining time to us lesser beings was as futile as trying to describe colour to a blind man, sound to a deaf one.
I interpret his comments as him saying time is an illusion caused by our current inability to see everything in every reality all at once - our human limitation. There are worlds out there to explore that are on no maps: perhaps as we humans continue to evolve, our mental sophistication will leap through itself ? Perhaps the evolution drive is heading in this direction. I hope so.
Does any of this explain deja vu experiences? Probable realities and doppelgangers?
Or what we call reincarnation? Let's have that reincarnation submission, M. Narada. I am intrigued.